Ir al contenido principal

Rights groups reject migrant detention

Human rights groups have united to voice their concerns over government plans to create a new detention facility for immigrants who arrive in Argentina without the necessary paperwork. The plans, born from an agreement signed between Security Minister Patricia Bullrich and the government’s National Imigration Directorate (DNM), were denounced by the Centre for Legal and Social Studies (CELS) and Amnesty International after a summary was posted on the DNM website. “Amnesty International discourages the routine use of detention of foreigners as a tool for the exercise of immigration control. Everyone, including migrants and asylum-seekers have the right to liberty and freedom of movement and protection from arbitrary arrest and detention,” Amnesty International Argentina said in a statement released in response to the proposals. The NGO added that the new proposals would jeopardize existing, more flexible rules in Argentina, promoted in the 2006 Patria Grande project and implemented in Law No. 25.871 of 2010, that have won praise from the international community and that emphasized the regularization of immigrants rather than the restriction of movement.

“The announcement ... represents a turning-point in Argentina’s immigration policy developed under Law No. 25.871, which is recognized worldwide for its approach to human rights and its promotion of regulating immigration control measures and restrictions on immigration,” the group said.

“Amnesty International warns of the negative impact on human rights of migration-related detention and opposes the use of detention as a form of punishment or deterrence, rather than addressing the causes which cause irregular immigration,” it added.

The National Immigration Directory posted details of an agreement signed between ministers from the federal and Buenos Aires City governments, including Security Minister Patricia Bullrich and National Immigration Director (DNM) Horacio García to use a building at Pasaje Alfredo Colmo 3860 on the southern sector of Buenos Aires City to hold detained “irregular immigrants.”

The City administration is also a part of the plans.

In the statement announcing the agreement, the government said that the new measures would apply “exclusively for the accommodation of those infringing Law 25.871 and its complementary regulations ... with the only and unique effect of fulfilling expulsion orders issued against foreigners within (the) necessary timeframe and (in order to) complete the purpose and scope set forth by the immigration authorities.”

According to the DNM website, the agreement will come into force from September 1 and last for an initial period of four years. It also assured that the building — which is believed to lie unused at present — would be subject to “renovation and a reconstruction of spaces, including (the addition of) environmental spaces, fire alarms, a hot water supply, electrical renovation and heating/cooling systems.”

It was not clear whether refurbishment of the designated building had already begun or would be completed ahead of the September 1 launch date.

‘Criminalization’

Despite the government’s assurances that the new proposals were in line with existing laws and the new facility would be ready for use before the deadline, NGOs denounced the move towards opening the detention centre in the first place and said that it could infringe the rights of migrants.

In a press release, CELS said that the government’s plan “implies the criminalization of migrants whose situation is irregular, associating them with a security problem,” rather than as a common circumstance covered under international law.

It added that the expulsion of immigrants from Argentina, a practice the previous government of former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner attempted to curtail, should only be used as a “last resort” and relied on judicial approval.

“Expulsion as a sanction against irregular immigration is a last resort that the State can use. In addition, the retention of a migrant person is only provided for a maximum period of 15 days and only in the context of expulsion. Expulsion ... can only be executed following reasoned decisions of the judiciary,” CELS said.

Other countries with stricter immigration laws than Argentina have come under fire from human rights groups in recent years for the use of detention facilities of undocumented immigrants, including Australia, whose government faced condemnation earlier this year after inhumane conditions and the abuse of refugee children were found to be commonplace at state detention facilities in Nauru.

Article 25 of Argentina’s national Constitution obliges the state to “encourage immigration, and (it) shall not restrict, limit or impose ... the entry into the Argentine territory of foreigners who arrive for the purpose of tilling the soil, improving industries, and introducing and teaching the sciences and the arts.”

Herald staff

http://buenosairesherald.com/article/220646/rights-groups-reject-migrant-detention

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

El origen de la chacarera

La chacarera es un ritmo y danza folclórica tradicional de Argentina, originaria de la provincia de Santiago del Estero. Ha llegado a extenderse por toda la Argentina y una parte del sur y oriente de Bolivia (región del Chaco). Se ejecuta tradicionalmente con guitarra, bombo legüero y violín. Es sin duda una de las danzas más antiguas del folclore argentino y es en la actualidad una de las más vigentes. De ritmo alegre y vivaz y gran arraigo en todo el Noroeste argentino, la región central y parte de cuyo, aunque si hablamos de chacarera, hablamos de Santiago del Estero, donde es la reina. La chacarera es una danza vivaz que, como la mayoría de las danzas Folklóricas argentinas, se baila en pareja. Esta es suelta (ya que los bailarines no se tocan) e independiente, es decir que hacen solas sus evoluciones, sin combinarlas con las de otra pareja. Pertenece al grupo de danzas picarescas, de ritmo ágil y carácter muy alegre y festivo, gozó de la aceptación del ambiente rural y ta

Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub la historia de un viajero sefardi

Ibrāhīm ibn Yaʿqūb (en árabe, إبراهيم بن يعقوب, también transcrito Ibn Jakub o Ben Jakub o Ibrahim Ibn al Jaqub al Israili at-Turtushi) o Abraham ben Yacov (hebreo), comerciante judío del Califato Omeya de Córdoba, natural de Tortosa, que viajó por la Europa Central y Oriental durante la segunda mitad del siglo X. En los años 960-970 viajó, por orden del califa de Córdoba, para comerciar con esclavos y para recibir audiencia de Otón el Grande, emperador del Sacro Imperio Romano Germánico. Este viaje le llevó a Irlanda a través de Burdeos y Noirmoutier. Luego atravesó el imperio de norte a sur, pasando por Utrecht, Maguncia y Fulda, visitando las tierras del reino de los checos y, a orillas del Vístula, la ciudad comercial de Cracovia. Finalmente abandonó Europa por Sicilia. El informe que escribió al regreso de su viaje es el primer documento escrito sobre las ciudades de Praga y Cracovia, así como de Vineta, además de relatar con detalle la vida y las costumbres de los pueblos eslav

Salud. De un obrero alemán que no mata trabajadores. Una hermosa leyenda urbana

En 1937, como parte de la ayuda que le brindó Hitler a Franco para vencer al bando de los republicanos, socialistas y anarquistas durante la Guerra Civil Española, el temible equipo de aviación alemán llamado “Lutwaffe” bombardeo varias ciudades españolas. Cuenta la leyenda urbana que en un pueblo de el País Vasco hubo una bomba que llegó a tierra pero nunca estalló.  La bomba había quedado incrustada en el medio de la plaza central del pequeño poblado.  Los pobladores sorprendidos y asustados no se animaron a moverla, y mucho menos desarmarla y allí permaneció años durante el gobierno de Franco como un símbolo aleccionador.  Claramente representaba la muerte, el poder del régimen y el castigo a quien se rebelara. Una día de primavera, por la mañana, Julen se cansó del detalle del paisaje que arruinaba la plaza. Buscó herramientas, pidió ayuda que no encontró, y se decidió a desarmar y quitar el artefacto. Las primeras horas trabajó solo, ante la mirada le